Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Matteo Martineau Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Martineau analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Matteo Martineau Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 2 - 0 Martineau
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.68% of points on his second serve, while Martineau has won 49.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martineau has won 48.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.93% and 30.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martineau has saved 61.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 67.12% of matches played (W/L 49/ 24), with Martineau winning 58.62% (W/L 51/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Martineau has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 52/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15), where as Martineau has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 40/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Carabelli winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 4 and Martineau winning 1. The last match between Carabelli and Martineau was at the Luedenscheid Challenger, 19-08-2021, Second, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Martineau have played a deciding set 1 times, with Carabelli winning 1 times and Martineau 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 1, and Martineau 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.96 while Martineau has played against players with an average rank of 267.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martineau has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martineau has converted 42.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
110
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
175
Rank
175
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
63% (316-184)
Career Total W/L
56% (271-216)
66% (27-14)
YTD W/L
54% (19-16)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$32,325
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Matteo Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 28 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:13 | 0:55:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (40/70) | 41% (33/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (29/40) | 79% (26/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 47% (22/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (32/80) | 34% (24/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Matteo Martineau
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
41%
(
33 of
80)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Matteo Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (27/14) | 54% (19/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (56/37) | 55% (47/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (493/425) | 51% (424/409) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (25/13) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 221 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.41 | 298.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1864/2965) | 69% (1716/2482) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1257/1864) | 72% (1227/1716) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (536/1101) | 49% (375/766) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (150/321) | 40% (88/221) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1264/2994) | 37% (948/2583) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 61% (19/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (25/39) | 54% (19/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 44% (7/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (18/4) | 24% (17/4) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Martineau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Matteo Martineau
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Henri Squire
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Matteo Martineau
37%
(
33 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
4
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Matteo Martineau
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Matteo Martineau
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Martineau Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
